Taboo? I Probably Should Feel Ashamed But I Only Feel Sleepy #Taboo
#FX #Post-mortem
For the love of all that is right, why? Why? Why, Tom Hardy, did you
choose this project of all the good projects out there? Sorry, I'm
jumping ahead of myself here. It's mid-season and another mid-season
show has just ended its limited run. You know what that means: a
snarky and snide review/recap of the entire season. Yaaayyy! What of
Taboo? Is it a show you need to go online or to your cable box
on-demand menu, and binge-watch, or does Taboo not even reach the
highest of tawdry, let alone dip a toe into the pool of a salacious
scandal? Let's find out together—well, not together. I already know
and you're reading it, so... You know what, you get how this works.
Let's go!!
FX's Taboo stars Tom Hardy as James Delaney, a prodigal son returned
to Britain to roam the filthy streets of London in 1814. He returns
under inauspicious circumstances as he has come home to honor the
death of his father. Thought dead himself—killed in a sea voyage or
made into barbaric animal of sorts—the shock of his return is felt
throughout most of the city as it has far-reaching implications. Son
to a wealthy man, Father Delaney died still in the ownership of one
of London's premiere shipping companies. The company goes everywhere
from the recently revolutionized American states to east India to
Africa (we all know what they're doing on that continent). At first
assumption, the company would go to his half-sister Zilpha Geary
played by Oona Chaplin (yes, she is the granddaughter of Charlie). Of
course, in those days most inheritances still went to men, so the
company would technically go to Zilpha's posh-whipped husband Thorne
Geary (I know posh didn't really exist back then, but follow me
here). That is until James returns to exact his Monte Cristo-ian
revenge upon those he felt wronged both him, his father and his
“wildling” mother. Oops, did I say wildling. Sorry, that's Game
of Thrones, the show that Taboo tries to be. Let's continue, shall
we.
Look, as far as plot, it is very simple: man returns to get some
revenge. After that, there isn't a whole lot of intrigue. Yes, there
are plenty of pseudo-side stories that, for me, never got interesting
but there's so little plot to me that actually connects that it
starts to make you wonder why this was so long. Every episode of the
eight episode series is an hour and a half long, which, frankly,
drags the story out to excruciating lengths, but if that's what you
have to do in order to get it on TV...
Speaking of the last two episodes—three, really—another subplot
forms in which this scholarly black gentleman pops up and starts
conducting an investigation into the sinking of an East Indian
Company ship. The ship was, at the time of its sinking, carrying a
cargo of slaves, though it was not supposed to be, and had briefly
changed its name in order to take the illegal shipment. He wants to
know who ordered the slaves on the ship and why the vessels sank the
way it did. What was most interesting, however, is that Delaney was
on the ship—one of the reasons why he was presumed dead. But even
though they have this mystery/investigation as a plot device, they
never quite do anything with it. The black guy asks a few white men
some questions, they give him that look of “dude, really? Come on.
You black in the 1800s,” and he smirks back like, “but I'm also
educated and have never been a slave,” and that's about it there,
too.
Americans With Guns |
Then we have the side plot about the Americans, which, frankly, I
didn't fully understand. So, there's some American spies who want to
disrupt Britain's business and its continual spread as an empire, and
I guess they're fighting for some land in America before the Brits
get it, but even with that, eh! Knowing my history, both the
revolutionary war and the war of 1812 or Mr. Madison's war had taken
place and America had won both. So why they are trying to mess with
Britain in any way is bizarre to me. More over, it was the French
that we bought the Louisiana territory from, not the Brits, so... I
don't know. I'd have to brush up on my history again, but, to me,
it's similar to after WWII when America and Britain shifted to look
at Russia, instead of Germany. We had just beat them in two wars, why
keep looking at them? Same here, America beat Britain twice. Why look
at them again? Even more to the point, the East Indian shipping
company was said to be the one with spies in reality, almost like a
pre-CIA or MI6. Wouldn't it, then, make more since for them to be
spying on the Americans... in America? I don't know.
INSERT FILTHY COMMENT ABOUT BROTHER-SISTER LOVIN' |
Finally, the one side-plot that I'm sure many people first thought of
when reading the word Taboo, Delaney wants to sleep with his sister
again, as they had quite the affair before he left. But even that is
tame by comparisons of other shows we've seen as of late. Game of
Thrones used the plot device in the most vicious and memorable way.
Even Cruel Intentions had its twisted incestual plot device always
lurking over the characters actions. Here, however, I could take it
or leave. It felt inconsequential and, to me, the show proved exactly
that when, on the finale, his sister kills herself after they had
screwed like mad dogs on episode six or seven. Even the
male-rams-butting-heads that Delaney should've been with her husband
Thorne came to a soupy climax, the flavor of violence and hatred
muddled as Delaney made another friend of the man. He spared him in a
pistol duel after the East Indian Company set Thorne up to fail by
giving him a gun with no bullets. It was like watching those new
Steven Seagull movies where, instead of kicking ass, he settles
things reasonably, and you're like, “What? Dude, Under Siege that
son of a gun! At least Under Siege 2 him! Gah!” SMH.
And then, if that's not the worst of it, his sister kills the man so
she can go and sleep with her brother with impunity. And the way she
is so giddy about having killed her husband and how subdued Delaney
is, you think, “Wait, we might be in for some kind of naughty Fifty
Shades of Grey here. She looks like she wants to be punished.
Finally, I feel ashamed watching a show called Taboo.” Nope! You
get it not! In fact, after one and a half episodes (which, was maybe
a week in show time) Delaney casts his sister's affections aside in
some half-noble belief that she should have a better life than he
will give her at the moment, and how he's destined to die and he
needs to keep with his pursuit of villainy, and yadda yadda yadda.
And because she can't have anymore brother-meat (ooo, that's nasty!),
she hurls herself off a bridge while her voice-over waxes poetic
about how much she loved him and how she hopes to meet him in the
afterlife. Again, she resisted him with a lover's longing in her eyes
for at least the first three episodes before hopping on his lap and
tempting him with one of those, “This is what you want? Well,
you'll never get it,” that all film/TV vixens do to the men right
before giving up the drawers. Here, it only turned into an
eye-rolling “come on” moment because of the characters' lack of
real power or character outside of the two men in her life.
Sad to say but for me, the last episode came in somewhat of a blur,
and I hardly remembered it. I do know that, after being captured,
imprisoned and questioned about what he knew about something dealing
with the Americans, Delaney said virtually nothing. The whole sinking
of the slave ship thing got resolved because somehow Father Delaney
and Sir Strange had given orders to put the slaves on the ship and
did some stuff that inevitably led to its sinking, leading the black
guy to go to Delaney's house, up to his study, see a letter and give
that all-too-familiar magical negro nod when the main white character
has done something good. He even says, “Justice!” And we're all
like, “Oh! That's what this whole thing was about: Justice! Of
course. I totally get it now.” There's also a huge set-piece
shootout with explosions and plenty of deaths down at the harbor, but
even that I couldn't quite figure out because, again, it had
something to do with the historically confusing American plot. So,
some redcoats started shooting at the undercover Americans that tried
to undo their business; Delaney, who is on the American's side has
ordered this chemist (I'm actually fascinated by him because I think
he'd make a great 19th century Walter White) to make bombs
and explosive powder which he does; Delaney and his men use it to
escape. But along the way a few people die including a male
cross-dresser that had been helping Delaney, and some other people.
Delaney, along with his father's secret wife (you just knew they were
going to sleep with each other and I can't remember them doing such),
and a brothel madam all escape on one of his ships with full crew on
board.
Our second ending is the simplicity of one final get-back where Sir
Strange sits down in his office and his secretary brings him a
letter/package of some sort. Naturally, he sits to read it, opens it
up and BOOM! Yes, it was from Delaney and his chemist, and was a
bomb. The end. Oddly, I rather enjoyed this quick end to the frail
haunt that was Sir Strange, because, while he was good, he wasn't
all-time evil or manipulative.
What's my grade? You really have to ask? I give this a C-, and that
is only because I know how some people like the slow-build of things
and I do think Tom Hardy was captivating every time we saw him on
screen. Also, the show is a visual masterpiece in its 19th
century grunge-bleakness. So, you definitely have something to look
at. However, there were so many things that I didn't enjoy about the
series that I couldn't overlook them all.
First, as said, the main plot is simple and should be easy to follow,
and it is, however, unlike in some iterations of Count of Monte
Cristo, this revenge plot meanders and fizzles rather than pops.
Though he says his intent outright a few times, we never get a sense
of the evil of the men who betrayed him. Yes, they technically killed
his father. Yes, they hated his mother because she was different and
was some kind of witch, supposedly, but we don't ever get a flashback
scene of what exactly they did to her or what his father did to her.
I say that knowing that the show delves (albeit briefly) into this
sorcery and poetic imagery because Delaney is seen multiple times
doing some kind of craft himself, communing with his deceased mother
in the wild. Even his sister is shown at what can only be described
as a 19th century exorcism, yet there is no scene where
they show the horrors we are supposed to believe these men may or may
not have committed, creating a lack of character connective tissue
with the audience.
Speaking of, all of the characters were both muted and mooted, in my
opinion. This is a show that relies very heavily on its visual
pretenses, which is good for a visual medium. However, it does that,
in many cases, to the detriment of the viewers if you ask me. There's
more dead silence or people wailing than there is snappy, crisp,
memorable dialogue. Truthfully, the only time you do remember some
dialogue is when it comes just before some sex, like Delaney's demand
that his sister take her dress off NOW, or when it comes at the end
of a character's arc. Even worse, half of the show is whispered,
something which I absolutely hate about period films. I don't
understand why people in Victorian-era and down to 1099 AD must
always whisper-mumble everything. Is everything a secret? Do people
think we only just recently developed loud voices? Gah! It drives me
mad.
As for them being mooted, no one makes a point to really stick out
here, or do anything worth writing home about for that matter. Again,
to compare it to Game of Thrones, everything the entire season inches
closer and closer to a penultimate and ultimate episode that leaves
you breathless and chatty. Here, most of what happens had me
shrugging so often because the characters don't seem to develop in
any way. There's no taunting of the pull between doing good and
exacting revenge. Most of the scenes are anticlimactic because
Delaney isn't even there when a great deal of the people die and he
never has an evil laugh about it all or even a good “that was
satisfying” smirk, either. Do something, man. Act unreasonable for
just a second. For instance, when his sister admits she killed her
husband so she could get some of that nasty brother-lovin' his
immediate reaction is not to rip her clothes off right then and there
like he wants. No, instead he goes to check on the body to make sure
the man is dead, then makes plans to have the body removed. What?
But... but... Whatever, dude! I would've even settled for him ripping
all her clothes off, having her ready for him, and then him
whispering something mean in her ear about how she can't have him,
then leaving. Bwahahaha! That would have been deliciously sinister,
not to mention would have set up that demanding encounter where they
do have sex all the more rich. Instead, this fool acts far too
reasonable, even politely suggesting that they shouldn't have each
other now. Where's the backbone. He even viciously slices a guy to
death during the day and can only muster a look of “well, that
happened.” It's maddening.
Wearing a Hat, Talking to a Horse. Life Goals! |
Should you be watching? If you weren't before, then I'll say you shouldn't now. Look, I am always apologetic for having certain opinions because I know how tough it is to be a creative in this industry, and I also know how so many good shows today don't get good until later seasons, but I can't for the life of me understand how this show is so highly rated on IMDb, nor how it has been renewed for a second season. The only reason I see for its renewal is that BBC also aired it in the UK and it must be a hit over there—maybe it's more tuned to British entertainment sensibilities—because a hit it was not over here. Again, I know that some TV shows take time to adjust and really get their rhythm and catch on, but at a cost of 10 million dollars (or it might have been pounds which is even more expensive) for the first season of eight episodes, I can't fathom making changes that will boost this show to the level of a West World or Thrones or even Mr. Robot. You can catch the full first season of Taboo on FX on Demand on your cable provider or online at FX or BBC.com.
What do you think? Have you heard about Taboo? If not, do you think
you'll check it out now or stay away? If you have, what did you think
about it? Am I being too tough on the show? Is it one of your new
faves or does it deserve to be canceled? And what did you expect from
a show with such a name? As always, let me know in the comments
below.
If
you’re looking for a scare, check the YA novel
#AFuriousWind, the
NA novel #DARKER, #BrandNewHome or
the bizarre horror #ThePowerOfTen.
For those interested in something a little more dramatic and adult,
check out #TheWriter.
Both season 1 and season 2 are out NOW, exclusively on Amazon. Stay
connected here for updates on season 3 coming summer 2017. If you
like fast action/crime check out #ADangerousLow.
The sequel A New Low will be out in a few months. Look for the
mysterious Sci-fi episodic novella series Extraordinary to premiere
sometime this winter on Amazon and my blog. Join us on Goodreads to
talk about books and TV, and subscribe to and follow my blog with
that Google+ button to the right.
Until next time, “You are a woman in
need of a serious spanking. And I just so happen to have a strap for
that. ”
P.S. Could they have fit a line like that in? Yes, of course. Did
they? I mean, come on! I thought Taboo meant something people didn't
discuss, something against regular standards and practices. If the
show had focused on one thing, rather than a bunch, maybe it would've
been something special. By the way, that line is actually from one of
my books, A Negotiation of Sorrows due out winter 2018. I'll think of
a better, more PG sign-off next time.
AmazonGoodreads Author Page
Goodreads Books Similar to TV Shows
Twitter@filmbooksbball
No comments:
Post a Comment