You've
Been Played Once More #Inauguration #Trump #Brexit #2017 #President
Congratulations,
America. No, congratulations to the US and Britain. Actually,
congratulations to the world (including Putin and that North Korean
mole-rat), you all fell for it. Again. You, the citizens of this
troubled but potentially great world, failed to heed the warning of
so many that have for years talked about those who are really in
power. Most specifically, you failed to believe me when I wrote a lot
of truth in my own novel The Provocateur. No, this is not a promotion
of that book. And no, I don't want to go into the details on why I
wrote it as a fictional novel, but I will say that the Provocateurs
are real, and that yes, they did choose me to write that book for
them. Why? I don't know, but I do know that they have the control. Of
what, you ask? Everything.
For
years, rumors of a small group of people who control or are trying to
institute a “New World Order” have been researched and studied,
theorized on and about, given countless names and monikers, said to
have been associated with the elite or wealthy or governments big and
small around the world. People were led to believe that so long as
everyone woke up and paid real attention, they would see that we have
been fooled. Far be it from me to be the person or voice you actually
believe in, but it is real. And for those who voted for Trump, you
fell once again for their tricks. For those who voted for Hillary,
you also fell for their tricks.
But
how could that be, you ask. It's quite simple really: the group
really in power, The Provocateurs are the ones who choose the winner.
ALWAYS! In fact, they run pretty much everything and even now are
effecting and affecting you and your future. Let's back up and review
some of the things told to me for the book.
Who
are The Provocateurs? One is quick to jump to other groups, names and
secret societies that have circulated the internet for years. “Oh,
that's just another name for the Illuminati or the Knights Templar”
or some other conspiracy theorist group—pick your poison. Don't get
me wrong, some of that information is actually true, but a lot of it
is misinformation that the Provocateurs release in order to mock
anyone willing to believe in it, and to make sure that they have
control of even those people that think themselves enlightened, “out
of the box” or “awake to the truth” thinkers. The most recent
rumor about the Illuminati is a cute bedtime story, but The
Provocateurs they are not. To call them such would be to undersell
the power of The Provocateurs, as well as the history of the group.
They've been around not for centuries, but for millenniums.
So
they're the rich people, right? Those Rothschilds and whoevers, or
its those leaders of industry. You know, the ones who gather in those
secret, highly-guarded meetings like the Davos or Bilderberg
conferences? Or the Washington, or Wall Street elite, those people
who routinely make the laws and skirt them for not just money but
power, too? Right? Right?
No.
That
is always the most mind-blowing, mind-boggling, mind-numbing thing
about all of this for people who first learn about The Provocateurs.
You'd think that clearly it would be billionaires who control the
world with no one over them. The supreme overlord of GE, the world's
biggest company, has to secretly be ruler of most of the world,
right? Or, to that point, how could one have such power and influence
without money or a powerful position? Well, The Provocateurs do it.
In fact, they are the ones that control the billionaires, the ones
who decide who will and who will not be rewarded with such an honor
and pressure (think about it: How could any family stay wealthy
through countless generations?No, they aren't all “just really good
at business.”) This not to say that The Provocateurs don't have
money, but that they find any currency of little importance. As far
as public office or high positions in private enterprises, why limit
their power and be restricted to such things as rules, laws, and the
will and wants of investors or voters? Many of these laws they have
influenced and are responsible for getting passed, so we know they
sure as hell wouldn't abide by them.
OK,
well then they must be a big network of people controlling stuff,
right? No, again. They're a very small group, a group that couldn't
be in every place and every corner of the world, but make it feel
that way. I'm sure that even you have had an eerie, almost unnatural
feeling that the world is a lot smaller than it actually is on some
days. And I'm not talking about the “coincidences” where you
travel half-way around the world on vacation and see someone you
know, or someone who knows someone you know. No, I'm talking about
that dizzying feeling you had as a child when you spun around for a
few seconds to make yourself feel the rotation of the earth:
something seems... off. That's how they make you feel. That's how
they influence you through everything and even everybody that you
come into contact.
 |
| May God Help Us All, Including him, his family, supporters and non-supporters alike |
Let's
bring it current: How does this factor into Trump, Clinton, Putin and
Brexit? Their plan was simple and is still being followed as I said
in my book. Every so often, they like to test their clout to make
sure that they still have the same kind of power they've always had
in order to shape the future as they wish. In order to do this, they
have to push and pull things to an extreme. So, get two candidates
that are extremes for either side. Do they appear as extremes? Not at
first. You have an old white guy (not necessarily breaking new ground
in the leadership position) and a white woman who has had experience
in the government. And then all they have to do is push. Push both
you and the candidates. We tend to think of control as this loud,
boisterous, driving thump of authority, when it really is a still,
small voice speaking to us, to anyone—willingly or
unwillingly—listening. How did they do this? Did they put those
words in Trump's mouth? Sometimes. Research suggestive mind control
for that, or watch that God-awful Will Smith and Margot Robbie film
Focus (not the other God-awful Will Smith and Margot Robbie film. You
know the one). But all they really have to do is keep hammering in
two slogans, or rather, a word and a slogan. In fact, the same word
and slogan that they planted the seeds for way back in 2007:
“Change”
and “I'm Unhappy.”
Change
and I'm unhappy has motivated the last three major elections, the
Brexit, the break-up of the Soviet Union and impending empirical
spread of modern Russia that they have planned (not to mention
countless divorces). Oddly, regardless of how this next four years
go, it will also be the driving force of the next election, too. That
is simply how it has been scripted. So long as any outside force can
influence you consciously or subconsciously to believe that you are
unhappy and that something needs to change, you will act upon those
feelings, because they feed into our most base instincts. The funny
thing about happiness is that a while back, The Provocateurs worked
with some of the founding fathers and mothers of modern psychiatry
and psychology in order to classify happiness or satisfaction with
one's self as a higher, more evolved instinct, a trick to help
stigmatize mental illness, but that's a completely other story.
The
trick for the Provocateurs is to convince you of something regardless
of whether it is the truth or not. Do you really need change? Maybe
or maybe not. But see, here's the secondary trick: convincing you
that any change needed is purely external.
I'm
from the Midwest: born and raised in northeast Ohio. I'm within
walking distance of a few farms. About 15 minutes down the highway, I
can get off in another town and look at what is now a vacant lot of
what used to be a very large factory (if I remember correctly, it was
a car factory of some sort). I've seen first hand some of the
“blue-collar decay” that Trump and Hillary talked about on the
trail. However, the one thing I've always noticed is the lack of
willingness to internally change from the people out of work due to a
shuttered business. Not all, by many of those who decry the closing
of factories in their town rarely hop to self-improvement as their
first answer. Nor are people willing to move to where the work is,
instead insisting that wherever they live will be restored to glory
if only for the right break. Regardless of whether they are
“boot-strappers” or “welfare recipients” both often look to
the government or businesses first as the cause and ruling body of
their life. That, to some extent, is true, but you have to be putting
forth every best effort if change is what you want. Some voters
recognized this and pointed out such hypocrisy, while others defended
their beliefs by listing some of the things they did. Unfortunately
neither mattered because the message of external change had already
been internalized. Same thing goes for unhappiness.
Again,
this is not to delegitimize any actual reasons for such feelings, but
to say that both the feelings and the actual reasons have all been
carefully coordinated long before you got around to feeling them.
Same
goes for Brexit. Not only did The Provocateurs have Brexit planned
years ago, but this was planned as far back as before the EU came to
be (they never enter into anything without having at least three
viable plans to get out of something). In some ways, maybe it is
comforting that there is never really any chaos (at least to them)
because practically everything that happens is part of their scheme.
That
then brings us to President Pussy-Grabber. The question is why did
they make him president? For many simple but good reasons. First, you
have the “caps off” scenario, or in other words the anything-
goes nominee. With current partisanship being so volatile, either
party can be pushed to an extreme for any and all future candidates.
Also, there is no cap on who can be president, save for their
documentation as a natural-born citizen. As I pointed out in my book
and contrary to some conservatives beliefs, Trump's election has
fully swung open the door to elect a gay or transgender president—the
very thing some (not all) of them fear. Why? Because the personal
character of a president no longer matters; in fact, the entirety of
the human shell no longer matters, but rather the show you put on to
satisfy and invigorate a subset. Be accused of rape (Bill) or talk
about harassment (Trump) or say racist things (Nixon), none of it
matters so long as you are trying to do right by the US. Do you have
to be Christian? No, so long as you act as if you have faith in
something other than the faith that dominates the current opposition
(in this case, Islam, though that will change before the end of the
Millennials' lifetime). Of course at this point, it sounds crazy even
for liberals to be closer to electing a gay president when a straight
white male won after a black man. But note the genius of The
Provocateurs plan, because if Hillary had won, we'd be contemplating
the same thing, “Now that we have a female president, we can have a
(insert ethnicity) or a (insert sexuality) president.” Hence, in
either case, they win by having made the country's political circus a
polarized pendulum.
 |
| Let the thievery and history re-writes begin! Picture courtesy of TMZ.com |
“But
neither was Hillary.” If that's your response, hello. Pay
attention! That is the point. There is no change. In fact, this
speeds up The Provocateurs' plan for what they want next as I
discussed in the book. Often, whenever we do a pull-out of any war or
conflict we are already in, we, in-turn, cause a larger war.
Isolation actually leads to more, bigger conflict and The
Provocateurs know this. Their plan is conflict. Oddly enough, in
going against the prevailing thoughts on war and how to defeat one's
enemies, the Provocateurs do not look for division, but unity. Here,
and throughout the world, we are unified through our disdain for
everything oppositional, and that goes for both sides. Unity in the
Provocateurs' plan often leads to far more division. Yet, they've
made all of us want the very thing that they will and have been using
to destroy us.
What
does this mean? Well, nothing, I guess. Can anyone change it? No,
save for a Provocateur. Is this the end for America? Are the
doomsayers right? Or will the MAGA crowd be vindicated like never
before? Well, I will give you the same signs that the Provocateurs
gave me. The numbers are 8, 7, and 22. From what I've seen, it will
take either 8, 7, or 22 weeks, or months for Trump to show the
truthfulness of his election. I happen to think that those will be
the good times before something terrible happens. But notice that if
we get the longer stick of that, the 22 months, many people will feel
they have been vindicated by that time. Near two years of
good-to-great prosperity in the country should prove all the
naysayers wrong, right? Even the seven months (or maybe it is July 22
of one of these years) is a good amount of time for people to point
and say, “see, he's not as bad as everyone thought he'd be.” And
maybe he won't be. But for all of those that say some people who fear
his presidency (I don't fear it at all) are overreacting, just
remember that you may want to say that it is not the end of the world
or that something like “nuclear war would never happen” or that
“life goes on” but at some point, one day soon, cooler heads
won't prevail. At some point you can never say never. At some point
the worst thing that can happen... will happen.
This
post has been different mainly because I try to stay away from the
political commentary that is so often pungent, divisive, and acrid to
potential fans of my work as a creative. I probably won't write on
politics again, at least not for a long time (few months or a year).
Also, I am fully aware of the backlash (albeit hypocritical and
ironic seeing as how the Republicans now have not one but two
Hollywood presidents to their name in Reality star Trump and B-movie
star Reagan) that creatives like actors, directors, singers, etc.
suffer whenever they speak on any kind of politics. However, it
needed to be said... again. And no, this is not to try to sell books,
though if you want to read the book The Provocateur you can buy it
here: The Provocateur. Honestly, it is a lesser work of mine. Hell, I'm more
concerned with trying to get people to read my episodic novella The
Writer (with season three coming this summer), my next written serial
Extraordinary (premiering this winter/spring), any of my other novels
or getting an interview with Leonardo DiCaprio and the other
producers of Captain Planet because I really want to write that film
and have wanted to for a while (I think I can balance a “liberal”
message with conservative viewers while still making the film fun;
you can help me with this by re-tweeting my tweets to Leo #shoe
#footprint). But hey, I'm just a writer.
You
want to call me a crazy crackpot? Go right ahead. A liberal
snowflake? You're very wrong about that, but fine (curious enough,
similar to Trump I don't drink nor smoke). A neck-bearded
basement-dweller? Whatevs! But don't say you weren't shown the signs.
Eight, seven, twenty-two. Whatever happens, you shouldn't let this
little blog post provoke you.
If
you’re looking for a scare, check the YA novel
#AFuriousWind, the
NA novel #DARKER, #BrandNewHome or
the bizarre horror #ThePowerOfTen.
For those interested in something a little more dramatic and adult,
check out #TheWriter.
Both season 1 and season 2 are out NOW, exclusively on Amazon. Stay
connected here for updates on season 3 coming summer 2017. If you
like fast action/crime check out #ADangerousLow.
The sequel A New Low will be out in a few months. Look for the
mysterious Sci-fi episodic novella series Extraordinary to premiere
sometime this winter on Amazon and my blog. Join us on Goodreads to
talk about books and TV, and subscribe to and follow my blog with
that Google+ button to the right.
Until next time, “...And did it
myyyyyyyy waaayyyy!”
P.S. Seriously, though, does no one see this? Yes, the song is about
doing it his way and getting what he wants but history may look back
with gaped mouth and scrunched brow on the fact that the 45th
entered his presidency with the first song chosen by him to dance to
starting with the lyrics “And now, the end is near...” Really!
The Provocateurs are laughing at us. A better song would actually
have been Usher's “My Way” especially since America is so often
referred to as female. The lyric: “You (current politicians) can't
satisfy her needs. She keeps running back to see me do it My Way.”
But hey, what's done is done. And they didn't even use the classic
Sinatra recording. SMH
P.P.S. This goes out just to any Republican critics. Note that
whenever democrats protest or are critical of Trump, many of them
aren't critical of you or the party per se, but rather the man that
Trump has proven to be time and again. I'm an independent, but would
people really act like this if Jeb had won or Cruz or Carson? No.
There wasn't this much unrest when either Bush was elected. It's not
about your party (although, some do feel that you allowed your party
to be hijacked by this man and should feel some admonishment) but
about the general disgust felt for this particular human being.
AmazonGoodreads Author Page
Goodreads Books Similar to TV Shows
Twitter@filmbooksbball
